Brexit: Theresa May wins ‘meaningful vote’ battle
Image copyright Getty Images The government has seen off a rebellion by Conservative MPs over Parliament's role in the Brexit process, winning the crunch vote by 319 to 303.
MPs backed Theresa May over what would happen in the event of there being no deal after key Tory rebels backed down.
It came after ministers agreed the Speaker would be able to decide if MPs had the power to amend a motion on what to do if there is no agreement the EU.
MP Dominic Grieve said the "sovereignty of Parliament" had been acknowledged.
And another potential rebel Nicky Morgan said this amounted to a "meaningful vote" and she would back it.
The UK is due to leave the European Union on 29 March 2019 and negotiations have been taking place over the terms of its departure.
The government has been at odds with the House of Lords in the long-running row over what happens if the UK cannot reach a deal with the EU, or if MPs reject whatever deal the government agrees with the EU.
Changes to the EU Withdrawal Bill put forward by the Lords would give MPs a greater say in these scenarios.
The Commons vote had been expected to be tight, with a chunk of Tory MPs agreeing with the Lords' position.
- Live updates: Commons debate on EU bill
- Can Theresa May 'take back control'?
- Brexit: All you need to know
- Brexit: Your guide to EU jargon
Labour was still urging its MPs to support the Lords' amendment, describing it as the "last chance" for Parliament to guard against "a no-deal Brexit" which it says would damage the economy.
But the government says giving Parliament the power to intervene in negotiations would bind Theresa May's hands in the talks.
Please upgrade your browser
Your guide to Brexit jargon
Enter the word or phrase you are looking for Search
Haven't MPs already voted on this?
Yes - last week the Commons overturned a differently-worded House of Lords amendment on the same subject, after would-be rebels who support giving Parliament a greater role were given assurances that the government would take their concerns into account.
But the would-be rebels were unhappy at the government's subsequent offer to meet their concerns, describing it as a "slap in the face".
On Monday the government was defeated by 119 votes in the Lords, who tabled a new amendment which would mean MPs have to "approve" whatever the government decides to do if there is no Brexit deal.
MPs are currently debating the rival amendments and will vote soon.
Theresa May's Conservatives do not have a majority in the House of Commons, and ministers will be hoping Tory MPs unhappy at what has been offered so far do not decide to rebel this time.
As well as what the would-be Tory rebels choose to do, the number of Labour MPs voting with the government could also be a key factor.
The sticking points
The debate centres on what happens in three Brexit scenarios:
- If MPs vote down the UK-EU Brexit deal
- If Theresa May announces before 21 January 2019 that no deal has been reached
- If 21 January passes with no deal being struck.
Under these circumstances, the government has said, a minister will make a statement in Parliament, setting out the proposed next steps.
MPs will then vote on this statement. According to the government, this vote should be "on neutral terms", with MPs simply noting what has been said.
But the Lords' amendment goes further, saying MPs should have to "approve" the minister's statement.
The Department for Exiting the European Union has now conceded that it will be up to Commons Speaker John Bercow to decide the matter at the time.
'Issue of assurance'
Speaking in the Commons, Dominic Grieve said he resented the way that peers had been "vilified" for doing their job.
While he regarded Brexit as a "historic mistake", he said he respected the vote of the British public to leave.
He said the issue of the meaningful vote was about giving "assurances to the House and many, many people in the country who are worried about this process and how it will end".
If Parliament wished to "speak with one voice" and exert its influence in the face of a non-deal scenario, it "has the power to do it".
Mr Grieve said he had insisted on a key paragraph in the government statement accepting "it is open to MPs to table motions and debate matters of concern and that, as is the convention, parliamentary time will be provided for this".
Earlier Solicitor General Robert Buckland urged MPs to make a show of "national unity" ahead of a key summit of EU leaders next week.
He said it was "important to send a clear message not just to the world of Westminster but to Brussels that this is a prime minister...that can get vital legislation through about Brexit".
EU has 'serious' differences with UK
Meanwhile, the EU has said there are "serious divergences" with the UK on a key issue in the negotiations - what happens to the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic after Brexit.
The UK and the EU have published a joint statement outlining the progress that has been made in the talks so far.
The EU's chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, praised the "dedication and commitment" of the negotiating teams, and said progress had been made in "separation issues" like customs, VAT and the European nuclear agreement, Euratom.
Repeating his call for a "fully operational backstop" to prevent a hard border in Northern Ireland, he added: "Today marks a step forward in these negotiations. but a lot more work needs to be done before October."
